There’s a particular ache that comes from cooking a dish your grandmother knew by heart, only to realize you’re missing half the ingredients—not because the store was out, but because a line drawn on a map turned them foreign. I was in my own kitchen in Amman, trying to recreate my sittu’s lentil and tamarind soup, when I noticed the tamarind came in a plastic pouch stamped “Product of India.” She would have used a block from the Iraqi souk—dark, sticky, smelling of the Tigris. But that market is now across a border that her grandchildren do not cross. The soup was good. It was not the same. This is the quiet violence of borders: they do not just separate land; they separate people from their pantries.

For centuries, the Eastern Mediterranean was a place where ingredients wandered freely—spices from Aleppo, olive oil from the Galilean hills, freekeh from the plains of the Hauran. People moved, too, carrying seeds and sourdough starters in their pockets. When my jiddo left Jaffa in 1948, he brought nothing but a copper ibrik and a handful of za’atar seeds, which he planted in the soil of his exile. The za’atar grew, but it tasted different—less wild, more obedient. He never said it aloud, but we knew: the land remembers what the mouth forgets.
The Taste of a Map Being Redrawn
When the Ottoman Empire collapsed and European mandates carved the Levant into nation-states, something invisible happened to kitchens. Borders became physical barriers, and with them came tariffs, import bans, and the slow erosion of shared foodways. A dish like kibbeh nayeh—raw lamb pounded with bulgur and spices—once stretched from Kilis to Kerak without changing its name. Now, you’ll hear people argue whether it’s Lebanese, Syrian, or Turkish, as if a recipe could carry a passport. The argument itself is a symptom of forgetting.
In 1923, the Treaty of Lausanne drew a line through communities that had eaten from the same clay ovens for generations. Greeks and Turks were exchanged, populations uprooted, and with them traveled seeds and techniques. The muhacir—Muslims resettled in Turkey from the Balkans—brought börek fillings no one in Anatolia had seen. At the same time, the Orthodox Christians who left Cappadocia for Greece took their cured pastirma and sweet pekmez. Dishes survived, but their contexts dissolved. A pastry that was once made for a saint’s feast became an everyday snack in a migrant neighborhood in Athens, its holiness stripped away by displacement.
The Hummus Line
You cannot talk about borders and food without mentioning hummus. In my lifetime, I’ve watched a simple bowl of chickpeas, tahini, and lemon become a battlefield. Lebanon and Israel both claim it as a national dish, and there are records of each side trying to set Guinness World Records for the largest plate. But hummus predates both states by centuries. Medieval cookbooks from Cairo and Damascus describe ḥummuṣ bi-tahina as a common street food, something you ate standing up, tearing bread with strangers. The tragedy isn’t that two nations love hummus—it’s that the rivalry has buried the deeper story: hummus belongs to a region, not a flag.

When I visited my friend’s family in Nazareth, her mother served hummus with a swirl of shatta and a hard-boiled egg on top. “This is how we always made it,” she said. “Before the checkpoint.” The checkpoint she meant was the one that now separates her from the olive groves her father tended near Jenin. The olives in her oil came from a can, labeled in Hebrew. She didn’t complain; she simply described a fact. Borders change what’s available, and availability changes memory. After a generation, the children do not know that the oil once tasted greener.
What Gets Left at the Crossing
Not all losses are visible. When my family fled from Haifa to Beirut, and later from Beirut to Amman, they left behind recipes that were never written down. My great-aunt Warda made a dish called samak bi tahini—fish baked with a sesame sauce that caramelized on top. She learned it from a Jewish neighbor in the 1940s, a woman who used a specific spice blend that included dried rose petals. No one in my family can replicate it now. The neighbor’s name is forgotten. The spice blend is a ghost. Warda died in 1997, still able to describe the taste but unable to produce it.
This is the second forgetting: the deliberate erasure of what we shared. In times of conflict, food becomes a marker of identity, and anything that blurs the boundary is suspect. In 2002, a Lebanese cookbook author told me she couldn’t include a recipe for knafeh without noting it was “stolen” by Israelis. But knafeh is a Nabulsi invention, a sweet cheese pastry that traveled from Palestine to the entire Levant long before modern politics existed. When we weaponize food, we lose the ability to taste it as a gift from a neighbor.
The Spice Route Inside a Suitcase
There’s a counter-story, though, one of stubborn preservation. Migrants and refugees are the great seed-bearers of history. In the 1950s, an Armenian woman in Beirut started selling sujukh—walnuts dipped in thickened grape molasses—from a cart. She’d learned the technique in Aintab, before the deportations. Her children now run a small factory in Bourj Hammoud, shipping the sweet, chewy strings to diaspora communities in Los Angeles and Buenos Aires. The border took her home, but it could not take her recipe.

I think of her whenever I grind cardamom for coffee. Cardamom is not native to the Mediterranean—it came from India, through trade routes that ignored modern borders. But in my grandmother’s kitchen, it was essential, the smell of hospitality. Today, I buy it from a shop in downtown Amman run by a Yemeni family who fled the war. They sell spices from their homeland alongside Syrian sumac and Egyptian duqqa. The shop is a tiny, fragrant protest against the maps that divide us. When I breathe in that air, I smell a world that refuses to be partitioned.
Recipes as Living Documents
I’ve come to believe that a recipe is a historical record. It tells you who traded with whom, who conquered and was conquered, who migrated and who stayed. Take maqluba, the upside-down rice and eggplant dish that’s a centerpiece of Palestinian tables. Its name means “upside-down,” and it appears in 13th-century Baghdadi cookbooks. By the time my mother taught it to me, it had absorbed influences from every army that marched through Jerusalem—Ottoman lamb, Circassian clarified butter, Persian saffron. To claim maqluba for one nation is to misunderstand it. It’s a document of survival, not ownership.
But survival has a cost. When a dish travels, it adapts to what’s available. In the Palestinian diaspora, musakhan—roast chicken on sumac-soaked bread—is sometimes made with flour tortillas in Chile, or with frozen markouk bread in Michigan. My cousin in Toronto sends me photos of her version, which she serves with a salad of arugula and pomegranate molasses. It is beautiful. It is also a small grief. The wood-fired taboon oven that gave the bread its smoky soul doesn’t exist in her apartment. The dish is alive, but it has lost its voice.
Feeding the Next Memory
What do we do with this knowledge? I don’t believe in culinary nationalism, in drawing borders around a plate. But I do believe in telling the truth about where food comes from and what it endured to reach us. When I teach my nieces to make warak enab—stuffed grape leaves—I tell them about the Armenian neighbor who taught their great-grandmother to fold them tightly, like small cigars. I tell them about the Greek woman in the same courtyard who used currants instead of rice, a trick from Smyrna. The story isn’t tidy. It doesn’t fit into a single national narrative. But it is honest.
And honesty, in the kitchen, tastes like something real. Last month, I made that lentil and tamarind soup again. This time, I found a Syrian grocer who still carries the Iraqi-style tamarind, wrapped in cellophane and tied with a rubber band. When I soaked it in hot water, the kitchen filled with a sour, ancient perfume. I added the lentils, the garlic, the cumin. I tasted it and wept—not because it was perfect, but because it was almost there. The border had taken something, but the spoon brought a little of it back.
Frequently Asked Questions
How did modern borders in the Middle East specifically change traditional food?
When the Ottoman Empire was divided after World War I, new nation-states imposed trade barriers, tariffs, and travel restrictions that disrupted the flow of ingredients that had moved freely for centuries. Spices, grains, and produce that once crossed regions without notice suddenly became “imports” or “exports.” Dishes began to be claimed as national property, and the shared culinary heritage of the Levant was slowly fragmented. Over time, communities lost access to certain varieties of herbs, cheeses, and oils, and the flavors of home cooking shifted to what was locally available within the new borders.
Why do some dishes become symbols of national pride or conflict?
Food is deeply tied to identity, memory, and land. When people feel their culture is threatened—by occupation, displacement, or diaspora—they often cling to dishes as emblems of survival. Governments and cultural movements then amplify these claims, turning recipes into nationalist symbols. Hummus, falafel, and knafeh are examples of foods that have been caught in political disputes, even though their origins are regional and predate modern states. The conflict obscures the fact that these dishes were once shared across communities with different faiths and languages.
Can a recipe truly survive when it is cooked far from its place of origin?
Yes, but it transforms. A recipe is not a fixed artifact; it is a living practice that adapts to new environments, available ingredients, and the hands that make it. A dish cooked in exile carries the memory of home, but it also absorbs the realities of the new place—different water, different heat, different produce. The emotional core remains, but the sensory details shift. This is not failure; it is evidence of resilience. The goal is not to freeze a dish in time but to tell its full story, honoring both its roots and its journey.